|
№
|
Description
|
Month Rating
|
Rating Changes
|
|
1
|
|
650
|
-2 (-0.3%)
|
|
2
|
|
362
|
+134 (+59%)
|
|
3
|
|
346
|
-71 (-17.0%)
|
|
4
|
|
338
|
+38 (+12.7%)
|
|
5
|
|
336
|
+32 (+10.5%)
|
|
6
|
|
288
|
+59 (+26%)
|
|
7
|
|
280
|
-116 (-29%)
|
|
8
|
|
251
|
+156 (+164%)
|
|
9
|
|
228
|
+10 (+4.6%)
|
|
10
|
|
224
|
+36 (+19.1%)
|
|
11
|
|
204
|
-69 (-25%)
|
|
12
|
|
202
|
+47 (+30%)
|
|
13
|
|
199
|
-12 (-5.7%)
|
|
14
|
|
193
|
-62 (-24%)
|
|
15
|
|
192
|
+36 (+23%)
|
|
16
|
|
173
|
+20 (+13.1%)
|
|
17
|
|
162
|
-54 (-25%)
|
|
18
|
|
161
|
-59 (-27%)
|
|
19
|
|
160
|
+34 (+27%)
|
|
20
|
|
157
|
+24 (+18.0%)
|
|
21
|
|
151
|
+12 (+8.6%)
|
|
22
|
|
150
|
-8 (-5.1%)
|
|
23
|
|
146
|
+35 (+32%)
|
|
24
|
|
146
|
-36 (-19.8%)
|
|
25
|
|
140
|
+15 (+12.0%)
|
|
26
|
|
139
|
-40 (-22%)
|
|
27
|
|
138
|
-27 (-16.4%)
|
|
28
|
|
126
|
+55 (+77%)
|
|
29
|
|
120
|
-6 (-4.8%)
|
|
30
|
|
116
|
+23 (+25%)
|
|
31
|
|
113
|
-8 (-6.6%)
|
|
32
|
|
112
|
-19 (-14.5%)
|
|
33
|
|
112
|
+7 (+6.7%)
|
|
34
|
|
111
|
+91 (+455%)
|
|
35
|
|
107
|
-22 (-17.1%)
|
|
36
|
|
105
|
-53 (-34%)
|
|
37
|
|
105
|
+0
|
|
38
|
|
101
|
+25 (+33%)
|
|
39
|
|
99
|
+41 (+71%)
|
|
40
|
|
98
|
-30 (-23%)
|
|
41
|
|
97
|
+79 (+439%)
|
|
42
|
|
95
|
-12 (-11.2%)
|
|
43
|
|
89
|
+31 (+53%)
|
|
44
|
|
89
|
-18 (-16.8%)
|
|
45
|
|
86
|
+53 (+161%)
|
|
46
|
|
84
|
+3 (+3.7%)
|
|
47
|
|
84
|
+26 (+45%)
|
|
48
|
|
84
|
-51 (-38%)
|
|
49
|
|
84
|
-26 (-24%)
|
|
50
|
|
83
|
-18 (-17.8%)
|
|
51
|
|
83
|
+68 (+453%)
|
|
52
|
|
82
|
+10 (+13.9%)
|
|
53
|
|
81
|
+48 (+145%)
|
|
54
|
|
80
|
-22 (-22%)
|
|
55
|
|
80
|
+41 (+105%)
|
|
56
|
|
80
|
+44 (+122%)
|
|
57
|
|
79
|
-9 (-10.2%)
|
|
58
|
|
79
|
+6 (+8.2%)
|
|
59
|
|
79
|
+18 (+30%)
|
|
60
|
|
77
|
-15 (-16.3%)
|
|
61
|
|
77
|
+39 (+103%)
|
|
62
|
|
76
|
+38 (+100%)
|
|
63
|
|
76
|
+38 (+100%)
|
|
64
|
|
76
|
+28 (+58%)
|
|
65
|
|
75
|
+16 (+27%)
|
|
66
|
|
74
|
-26 (-26%)
|
|
67
|
|
72
|
+57 (+380%)
|
|
68
|
|
72
|
+47 (+188%)
|
|
69
|
|
71
|
+16 (+29%)
|
|
70
|
|
70
|
+38 (+119%)
|
|
71
|
|
70
|
+4 (+6.1%)
|
|
72
|
|
70
|
+30 (+75%)
|
|
73
|
|
70
|
+40 (+133%)
|
|
74
|
|
69
|
+14 (+25%)
|
|
75
|
|
69
|
+29 (+73%)
|
|
76
|
|
69
|
+13 (+23%)
|
|
77
|
|
68
|
+37 (+119%)
|
|
78
|
|
68
|
+32 (+89%)
|
|
79
|
|
68
|
+23 (+51%)
|
|
80
|
|
67
|
+36 (+116%)
|
|
81
|
|
67
|
+40 (+148%)
|
|
82
|
|
67
|
+28 (+72%)
|
|
83
|
|
67
|
+22 (+49%)
|
|
84
|
|
66
|
-27 (-29%)
|
|
85
|
|
66
|
+28 (+74%)
|
|
86
|
|
66
|
+48 (+267%)
|
|
87
|
|
66
|
+16 (+32%)
|
|
88
|
|
66
|
+20 (+43%)
|
|
89
|
|
65
|
+26 (+67%)
|
|
90
|
|
65
|
+12 (+23%)
|
|
91
|
|
65
|
+20 (+44%)
|
|
92
|
. Предлоги в, на, за, над, пол, между, перед: конспект СООД по развитию зрительного восприятия у детей старшего дошкольного возраста с нарушением зрения / Н. В. Федюшкина // Открытый конкурс дидактических материалов тифлопедагогов и педагогов, работающих с детьми с нарушением зрения "ИРИС - исследования, развитие, инновации, сотрудничество": [сборник: текст электронный / СПб ГБУК "Государственная специальная центральная библиотека для слепых и слабовидящих"]. – Санкт-Петербург, 2022. – 4 с. — Свободный доступ из сети Интернет. — Электронные данные (1 файл : 193 КБ). — <URL:http://tlib.gbs.spb.ru/dl/12/iris/Федюшкина_Предлоги в на за над.pdf>.
|
65
|
+38 (+141%)
|
|
93
|
|
65
|
+14 (+27%)
|
|
94
|
|
65
|
-25 (-28%)
|
|
95
|
|
64
|
-5 (-7.2%)
|
|
96
|
|
64
|
+32 (+100%)
|
|
97
|
|
64
|
+26 (+68%)
|
|
98
|
|
64
|
+18 (+39%)
|
|
99
|
|
63
|
+5 (+8.6%)
|
|
100
|
|
63
|
+22 (+54%)
|